- Page 1
- Page 2 - Page 3 - Page 4 - Page 5 - Page 6 - Page 7 - Page 8 - Page 9 - Page 10 - Page 11 - Page 12 - Page 13 - Page 14 - Page 15 - Page 16 - Page 17 - Page 18 - Page 19 - Page 20 - Page 21 - Page 22 - Page 23 - Page 24 - Page 25 - Page 26 - Page 27 - Page 28 - Page 29 - Page 30 - Page 31 - Page 32 - Page 33 - Page 34 - Page 35 - Page 36 - Page 37 - Page 38 - Page 39 - Page 40 - Page 41 - Page 42 - Page 43 - Page 44 - Page 45 - Page 46 - Page 47 - Page 48 - Page 49 - Page 50 - Page 51 - Page 52 - Page 53 - Page 54 - Page 55 - Page 56 - Page 57 - Page 58 - Page 59 - Page 60 - Page 61 - Page 62 - Page 63 - Page 64 - Flash version © UniFlip.com |
www.bito.com
Economic efficiency of carton live storage
Conventional shelving Carton live storage
Comparison
Our comparison presents two storage installations which supply 36 different items. It is evident that storage is more compact and presentation of goods is much clearer in a carton live storage installation. Live storage gives immediate access to all 36 items at the picking face. Each item moves unassisted into the picking position. Sufficient replenishment quantities guarantee constant availability of goods.
Loading
Order picking
Compact storage and the elimination of unnecessary aisles result in a gain in floor space of at least 20 %. Strictly separated working aisles prevent that replenishment interferes with order picking which increases staff productivity. Short travel routes reduce order picking times.
Whereas information and picking times remain the same for both solutions, travel times are drastically reduced. This leads to an overall reduction of working time and to an increase in picking performance. A 66 % reduction in travel time results in an overall reduction of 40 % of the total order picking time.
Info time
Picking time
Travel time Info time
Picking time
Travel time
5
|