background image
Chapter 6: Koori women's experiences in prison and post release 65
According to Corrections Victoria, "the central
aim of classification and placement is the safety
of prisoners, staff and community, while ensuring
prisoners are accommodated at the lowest level
of security appropriate for their circumstances".
378
The assessment tool used to determine the
security rating assesses factors including:
· nature and severity of the offence and risk of
further offending
· severity of prior criminal convictions
· risk and history of escape
· history of institutional violence and the risk of
welfare of the prisoner herself
· prior major offence convictions
· outstanding court matters
· drug/alcohol history
· stability factors at the time of arrest (housing,
education, employment)
· history of instability during current or recent
terms of imprisonment
· prior good institutional conduct
· having children or being pregnant
· age.
379
The Corrections Regulations require Sentence
Management Panels to make decisions regarding
placement as part of the classification process.
380
The panels consider individual security ratings,
management and needs of the prisoner,
community protection, and the efficient and
effective operation of the prison.
381
Assessment is
ongoing throughout the prisoner's sentence.
Figure 9 ­ Comparison of security classification between Koori and non-Koori female prisoners 2011-12
Security classification
All female prisoners
N=319
Proportion %
Koori female prisoners
N= 40
Proportion %
Maximum
94
29.46%
19
47.5%
Medium
105
32.9%
9
22.5%
Minimum
120
37.6%
12
30%
Source: State of Victoria, Corrections Victoria, Transition of Koori women to Tarrengower Prison (2012) 11.
378
Ibid ch AC4.
379
Ibid ch AC3.
380

Corrections Regulations 2009
(Vic) reg 23(1).
381

State of Victoria, Corrections Victoria, `Transition to
Tarrengower', above n 331, 4.
Koori women are more likely to have a higher
security rating
A comparison of security classification ratings
indicates that a lower proportion of Koori women
are classified as minimum or medium security, and
a higher proportion are classified as maximum
security, compared to non-Koori female prisoners.
As the table below shows, in 2011-12, while 29
per cent of all female prisoners were classified
maximum security, 48 per cent of Koori female
prisoners received this classification.
382
The Security Rating Tool used to assess female
prisoners predominantly assesses static
(unchangeable) factors such as prior criminal
convictions, previous history of offending
and imprisonment. The disparity in security
classification most likely reflects and reinforces
the pattern of Koori women cycling in and out
of prison. Over half the cohort of Koori women
in custody during 2012 had a history of prior
offending and imprisonment.
383
While there are specific male and female
assessment tools, cultural responsiveness appears
to play less of a role in the determination of a
prisoner's security rating.
384
However, the Sentence
Management Branch is required to consult with
the Aboriginal Wellbeing Officer at DPFC about
placements. Sentence Management Panels must
also offer all Koori prisoners the "opportunity
of being assisted by such officers during
Sentence Management Panels, particularly in the
classification process".
385
382

This may reflect patterns of offending however, Victoria
Police data suggests that most alleged offences are at
the lower end of the scale. See Figure 5 `Victoria Police
data on alleged offences by Koori men and women
2011-12' on page 34.
383

State of Victoria, Corrections Victoria, `Transition to
Tarrengower', above n 331, 11.
384

In relation to scoring for having lived at the same
address for the last 12 months, this includes living in
the "same tribal area". State of Victoria, `Sentence
Management Manual', above n 377, ch AC3, 7.
385

State of Victoria, Corrections Victoria, `Sentence
Management Manual', above n 377, ch AC4, 8.