background image
Chapter 5: Courts and diversion 49
Figure 8 ­ Koori Court (Magistrates' Court) accused by gender
2008/2009
2009/2010
2010/2011
2011/2012
2012/2013
Females
Males
Females
Males
Females
Males
Females
Males
Females
Males
Bairnsdale
4
15
7
39
5
23
13
21
3
26
Broadmeadows
28
86
44
98
32
75
13
69
29
70
LaTrobe Valley
4
20
6
32
4
30
9
23
16
25
Mildura
28
51
30
45
29
61
27
57
15
46
Shepparton
25
70
31
77
28
59
18
57
21
83
Swan Hill
13
38
12
23
14
25
9
15
9
22
Warrnambool
Circuit
6
15
7
19
12
16
6
13
8
18
Totals
108
295
137
333
124
289
95
255
101
290
Source: Specialist Courts and Court Support Services, Magistrates' Court of Victoria (supplied to the Commission on 31 July 2013)
The Magistrates' Court
In Victoria, the vast majority of matters relating to
Koori women are dealt with by the Magistrates'
Court.
276
The role of the court is to determine guilt and
sentence the offender as appropriate. In addition,
the Magistrates' Court has specific functions
relating to bail. The Magistrates' Court has also
developed preventative and therapeutic responses
to achieve better justice outcomes.
Bail
In 2010, amendments to the Bail Act included
Aboriginality as a factor that must be considered
when making a determination for bail.
277
That is, the
decision-maker must take into account any issues
arising from the accused's Aboriginality, including
cultural background, ties to family place and any
other relevant cultural issues or obligations relating
to that person.
278
For example, a decision-maker
would be required to take into account matters
such as an obligation to attend a community
funeral or participate in community cultural
activities when imposing conditions of bail.
279
While the provision requires decision-makers take
Aboriginality into account, it does not require the
decision-maker to reach a particular decision. The
test for granting bail remains unchanged, that is
unacceptable risk.
276

In 2010-11, 95 Koori females were sentenced by the
Magistrates' Court, while six were sentenced by the
higher courts. Information provided to the Commission
by Sentencing Advisory Council on 1 February 2013.
277
Bail Act 1977 (Vic) s 3A.
278

Paper prepared by Deputy Chief Magistrate Jelena
Popovic for the purposes of the JCV Bail Act Twilight on
2 December 2010.
279

Statement of Compatibility, Bail Amendment Bill 2010
(Vic) [3495].
In making this change to the Bail Act, the Victorian
Parliament was responding to the fact that Koori
offenders are over-represented on remand and
face unique disadvantages in their contact with the
criminal justice system.
280
Section 3A recognises that
Substantive equality is not necessarily
achieved by treating everyone
equally, and that affirmative action
or positive discrimination may be
necessary to achieve equality for
some groups in the community. As the
purpose of section 3A is to recognise
historical disadvantage, which has
led to the overrepresentation of
Aboriginal people on remand, in
accordance with section 8(4) of the
Charter, it constitutes permissible
discrimination.
281
Section 3A also promotes the cultural rights of
Aboriginal persons protected by the section 19(2)
of the Charter because it requires a decision-
maker to take into account any issues that arise
due to the Aboriginality of an accused, which
may, include participation in cultural events or
ceremonies.
Despite these good intentions, the Commission
understands that section 3A is under-utilised. We
further understand that while information about the
amendments was circulated to Bail Justices and the
Magistrates' Court, until very recently no specific
guidance had been made available, which has
inhibited the capacity of the section to do its work.
280

Explanatory Memorandum, Bail Amendment Bill 2010 (Vic).
281

Statement of Compatibility, Bail Amendment Bill 2010
(Vic) [3495].