background image
H
OW
W
E
S
EE
I
T
L
ETTERS
T
O
T
HE
E
DITOR
Page 42
June 28, 2013
The Dispatch/Maryland Coast Dispatch
The Maryland Coast Dispatch (USPS
#015125) is an official and legal newspa-
per for Worcester County. Periodical
postage paid at Berlin, Maryland, and
additional mailing offices.. The Mary-
land Coast Dispatch, 10012 Old Ocean
City Blvd., Berlin, Md. 21811, is pub-
lished weekly on Friday mornings, 52
weeks a year. Subscription rates are $75
per year, $55 for six months.
POSTMASTER: Please send change
of address to Maryland Coast Dispatch,
P.O. Box 467, Berlin, Maryland 21811.
Maryland Coast Dispatch offices are lo-
cated at Route 346 and Graham Avenue,
Berlin, Maryland.
The Dispatch
The Dispatch
Forever In Memory Of Our
Founder, Dick Lohmeyer
(May 25, 1927-May 5, 2005)
The Dispatch, Serving Greater
Ocean City Since 1984,
Is Published By Maryland Coast
Dispatch Inc. Weekly
On Friday Mornings
MAILING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 467
Berlin, Md. 21811
PHYSICAL ADDRESS:
10012 Old Ocean City Blvd.
Berlin, Md. 21811
PHONE: 410-641-4561
FAX: 410-641-0966
WEBSITES:
www.mdcoastdispatch.com
www.facebook.com/thedispatchoc
J. STEVEN GREEN
Publisher/Editor
editor@mdcoastdispatch.com
NEWS DEPARTMENT
SHAWN J. SOPER
News Editor
Sports Editor
ssoper@mdcoastdispatch.com
JOANNE SHRINER
Staff Writer
joanne@mdcoastdispatch.com
TRAVIS BROWN
Staff Writer
travis@mdcoastdispatch.com
SALES DEPARTMENT
TERRI FRENCH
Account Executive
Entertainment Editor
terri@mdcoastdispatch.com
JEANETTE DESKIEWICZ
Account Executive
jeanette@mdcoastdispatch.com
MANETTE CRAMER
Account Executive
manette@mdcoastdispatch.com
ART DEPARTMENT
CINDY WARD
Art Director
art@mdcoastdispatch.com
JENNIFER T. O'BRIEN
Graphic Artist
COLE GIBSON
Graphic Artist
Webmaster
BUSINESS OFFICE
PAMELA GREEN
Bookkeeper
Classifieds Manager
classifieds@mdcoastdispatch.com
It's about convenience, not the
money.
That's what Ocean City officials
reported this week after getting
hammered on social media over its
new $50 park-all-day fee at the Inlet
parking lot on the Fourth of July.
The public is not buying that con-
tention one bit and many are angry
over what is being perceived as a
blatant gouging of motorists and an
attack on day-trippers.
Although many are just hearing
about this change now, this decision
was made months ago and it was
reported at that time. However, like
many things, the uproar did not
come then because it was months
away. Now, with the Fourth looming,
the public, or at least those with
some social media savvy, have ex-
pressed their outrage. This is just
the latest public relations black eye
the resort has endured on the park-
ing front in recent months.
Here's a G-rated post that gener-
ally summed up the opposition to
this move: "So sad that OC has de-
cided their bottom line is more im-
portant than the tourists. I'm asham-
ed that they have decided to do this.
You are driving families away from a
fun experience. Terrible and stupid
public relations move ..."
Here's another of the tame vari-
ety: "What else can OC government
come up with to gouge tourists? If
they really wanted to benefit the
tourists and the town all of OC
through the night to after the fire-
works to 11 p.m. That would have
cost $32.50 previously, compared to
the flat fee of $50.
We think the $50 fee is too high
as well, but agree with the method-
ology the city used to alter the fee
model. The fact is many people
watch the fireworks on the beach
and then head home immediately
thereafter. That means they are
paying to sit in their cars as they
wait to pay the attendant. That can
be aggravating. The flat fee erases
that situation.
It's going to be interesting to see
how this fee goes over next Thurs-
day. Many will surely be unaware of
the change in policy, and that could
result in issues at the entrance to
the lot from motorists who refuse to
pay it. They will likely be granted ac-
cess, but only to turn around and
immediately leave the lot.
The parking lot is going to fill and
reach capacity, probably sometime
mid-afternoon. What will be compel-
ling is reviewing a comparison of
when the lot first filled up last year
as opposed to this year as well as
the impact on traffic after the fire-
works.
Obviously, the revenue numbers
are going to surge, but officials main-
tain the move was not made for that
reason. Of course, once the revenue
increase is realized, it will be even
more difficult for the city to maintain
it was not about the money.
would have free parking on the 4th
of July ­ like the rest of America that
celebrates this holiday ... perhaps
the Mayor and Council need to do a
little research to remember exactly
what this holiday is about."
In response, Communications
Manager Jessica Waters reiterated
the move is not about revenue and
is aimed at addressing some long-
standing issues associated with the
busy holiday.
"There is a misconception, and
why people are getting upset is that
they think it was done for revenue
purposes but it was not ... it was a
decision that was made to improve
operations for our visitors and hope-
fully make traffic flow a little smooth-
er, and avoid having people pay for
time they are waiting in traffic ... the
good news is we have multiple op-
tions for parking," Waters said.
Although Waters' point is valid,
the general feeling seems to be if
it's not about revenue generation,
then the flat fee should be lowered.
Detractors have a point there.
A comparison of charges is help-
ful here. The town charges $2.50
per hour on weekdays to park in the
Inlet parking lot. Therefore, if a mo-
torist parks at 5 a.m. and stays until
midnight, covering a 19-hour period,
the fee will be $47.50. Of course,
that is highly unlikely. A more mod-
erate approach would be to consid-
er a beach arrival time of 10 a.m.
with plans to stay all day and
$50 Fee Outlandish
Editor:
Fifty dollars to park at the Inlet ­
have the city leaders lost their
minds? Fifty dollars is an outra-
geous amount for a day parking.
To say it's not for the revenue is
political talk for we are trying to suck
as much out of the visitors as we
can. Wouldn't $30 be more reason-
able? Who came up with this out-
landish amount?
I don't go to the Inlet on the
Fourth of July because it's always
too crowded and I prefer the enter-
tainment at Northside Park, but I
feel sorry for those that do and will
be saddled with this outlandish fee.
I think everyone should call City
Hall and complain, write emails to
the mayor and all the council people
and complain. Then maybe when
the people's voices are heard this
will be reduced, but who am I kid-
ding. What do they care?
They will probably all be home or
parked in their free parking spaces
at City Hall.
Len Bender
Ocean City
Light Change Welcomed
Editor:
Finally, kudos to the city.
They have finally adjusted the
traffic lights at 94th Street to give
went on their way.
When our guest awoke, he was
upset and felt somewhat helpless
and abused. The best I could do
was to tell him to write a letter to the
city since it is obvious that he will
not be able to come back in a month
or two to present his argument in
court.
And then the City Council de-
bates whether or not we should
paint a water tower, "Thank You For
Coming To Ocean City." Thanks in-
deed. Let's just hope he didn't get
stopped for speeding by the four to
six State Police troopers that set up
a radar station to unsuspecting in-
coming traffic every day.
It seems to me that in a town that
was truly caring and appreciative
that its police, if they wanted to
demonstrate that they were truly
proficient in their work and interest-
ed in our tourists and the city, would
have handled this situation much
differently. But, in a town that thinks
more of squeezing each dollar out
of each tourist, it is understandable
that the $30 or $50 earned by the
police to help meet the city's deficit
spending caused incidentally by the
pay raises negotiated by the police
union is going to take priority.
Al Wendling
Berlin
the pedestrians a fighting chance to
get across Coastal Highway safely.
Previously, there was about a three-
second delay before the light chan-
ged from walk to green for vehicle
traffic. Now there is over a 30-sec-
ond walk signal before vehicles can
turn onto Coastal Highway from
94th Street,
Certainly, a step in the right direc-
tion.
P. Wiedermann
Ocean City
OC Priorities Off
Editor:
While we spend $5 million a year
for advertising in four states and
Washington, D.C., to get people to
come to Oecan City, it would seem
that we could and should inform the
police in the town that we appreci-
ate guests who come here and we
do not want to unnecessarily harass
them.
I am referring to a situation I saw
today, Saturday, June 22. A tourist
whose wife was shopping on the
Boardwalk fell asleep in the car and
his parking meter ran out. The city
response: two teams of two police-
men each visited his car. Did they
knock on his window to tell him of
the problem(s) or, even worse, to
see if something was wrong? No,
they each wrote him a ticket and
$50 Holiday Parking Charge Causes Uproar
SEE NEXT PAGE