background image
22 Protecting us all: 2012 report on the operation of the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities
The Charter ensures that human rights are taken
into account in the development of new laws
at the state and local level. Having effective
processes in place to develop and assess laws
against human rights standards is essential for
accountable and transparent government.
Scrutiny by Parliament
The Victorian Government reaffirmed the
importance of the Parliament's scrutiny of Bills in
its response to the four-year review of the Charter.
The Government supported recommendations
made by SARC to improve these processes. This
commitment is already apparent in statements of
compatibility that are more concise and targeted
to relevant rights that are clearly limited by a Bill.
The Government has engaged with the process
and in dialogue with SARC and the Parliament.
The SARC reporting process and ministerial
response time has become much quicker,
enabling this conversation to happen while a Bill
is before Parliament.
The dialogue model established by the Charter
enables a process to create and amend laws
so that human rights considerations are taken
into account at every stage of the law-making
process. The human rights impact of a Bill
is considered at the drafting stage, when a
statement of compatibility is prepared to
accompany the Bill's introduction into Parliament.
This informs parliamentarians of the human rights
that are potentially limited by the bill and why any
proposed limitations are reasonable and justified
(section 30 of the Charter). Members can
consider this assessment and raise any concerns
during the parliamentary debate. To assist this
process, SARC also prepares a report that is
tabled in Parliament that considers whether, in its
view, human rights are adversely impacted by the
Bill (section 30 of the Charter).
Quick facts 2012
Total Bills introduced into Parliament in
2012 ­ 98
Total Bills assessed by SARC as
potentially incompatible with the human
rights set out in the Charter ­ 19
6
6 Parliament of Victoria Scrutiny of Acts and
Regulation Committee Alert Digest No. 18 of 2012,
11 December 2012.
Federal human rights
parliamentary scrutiny process
Since January 2012, when drafting new
legislation, the Australian Government
is required to consider the human rights
obligations set out in the seven "core"
international human rights treaties that
Australia has ratified.
7
Each new Bill
introduced into federal Parliament must
be accompanied by a statement of
compatibility regarding the proposed law's
compliance with these rights and freedoms.
A new Parliamentary Joint Committee on
Human Rights examines Bills and legislative
instruments for compatibility with human
rights. It considers and reports on all Bills
and legislative instruments, regardless of
whether they raise human rights concerns.
8
The Committee may also hold inquiries
into existing Acts, including calling for
submissions, holding public hearings and
calling for witnesses. It will also inquire into
matters relating to human rights referred to it
by the Attorney-General.
The scheme promotes scrutiny of a
wide range of human rights contained in
international human rights law. These extend
beyond civil and political rights to economic,
social and cultural rights; for example, the
right to health, education and social security,
as well as rights specially relating to people
with disabilities, women and children.
7 Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011
and the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny)
(Consequential Provisions) Act 2011.
These treaties
are the: International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights 1966, International Covenant on Economic,
Social and Cultural Rights
1966, International
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial
Discrimination
1965, Convention on the on the
Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against
Women
1979, Convention against Torture and Other
Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or
Punishment
1984, Convention on the Rights of the
Child
1989 and Convention on the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities
2006.
8 The report by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on
Human Rights divides reports into `Bills requiring
further information to determine human rights
compatibility' and `Bills unlikely to raise human
rights incompatibility'.