Page 16 The Dispatch/Maryland Coast Dispatch November 22, 2013 City Weighs Contract Preference By TRAVIS BROWN STAFF WRITER SALISBURY – During discussion of a possible veterans’ preference policy for city contracts, the Salisbury City Council decided to look into expanding those inclinations to cover matters like local and minority owned business as well. “If you’re going to change your charter, make it broad strokes,” said Council President Jake Day. The original discussion Monday was in regard to what kind of preference Salisbury should show for businesses seeking city contracts that were owned by veterans or service disabled veterans. The preference would likely take the form of a percentage credit on the project. For example, a veteran owned business might receive a 5-percent boost in value to the contract bid. “It almost becomes a scoring system, but it’s pretty easy to determine,” said Day. But in discussing a veterans preference policy, Day revealed that he would also like to see something similar for locally owned businesses. “I think what we can do, what I’d like to see is some variation on two parallel and potentially combined preferences: a locally owned preference, and a veterans and service disabled veterans preference,” Day said. That opened a door to some other preference programs that the council thought were worth consideration, such as minority- or femaleowned businesses. “If we’re going to do this, then I think we should include that at the same time, curveball into one,” said Councilwoman Laura Mitchell. Councilman Tim Spies asked about the status of preferences for new small businesses in Salisbury. “What about a start-up business in Salisbury? Is there anything additional?” he asked. There isn’t at the moment, but Councilwoman Terry Cohen felt that a preference for new business ran the risk of forgetting about established businesses that were just as worthy and needed as much or more help. If preferences are expanded, there’s the potential for them to stack. A veteran-owned business could also be locally- and minorityowned. City Attorney Mark Tilghman told the council that other municipalities have put caps in place for a maximum preference allotment. Cecil County, for instance, caps all preferences at 6 percent of the project cost or $60,000, whichever comes first. Salisbury would also want to be careful in the language used regarding preferences. “We wouldn’t want to stick something in there that might tie our hands in a major contract situation,” said Tilghman. There’s a potential major cost behind preferences as well. Any preference on city contracts has to be defensible in case charges of favoritism are leveled. This is usually accomplished by conducting a study. Tilghman believes that Salisbury can base most of the preference policy on studies already done by the state, but needs to be careful of exceeding that because those same studies tend to have high price tags so Salisbury couldn’t afford to conduct one solo. “I think we can probably piggyback on the state of Maryland with anything that’s been done in regards to its legislation,” Tilghman said. “But if we’re going to go beyond that it would be in a situation where we have to spend $50,000 to justify something.” The expanded scope of the legislation is sending the matter back to draft. Mitchell pointed out that the city will also need to re-advertise the resolution. “Now we’re talking about local business preference, minority preference,” she said. “That could bring some different comments then what we have.” The council agreed to have a new resolution drafted to be presented at the next work session in December. . . Seahawk Road Annexation Eyed FROM PAGE 14 needs to be predicted in Bunting’s opinion. Any development would bring increased traffic to the area. The developers have committed to a service road and other traffic calming, however, and Cropper stressed that his clients are out in the community having conversations. “As part of our due diligence, we met with many stakeholders, including but not limited to, certain members of the Berlin Town and Council, the Worcester County Board of Education, people that live and work in close proximity to the project and others who work for the Worcester County government,” he wrote. Tudor underlined the importance of having a solid annexation agreement in place. While he wouldn’t expect anyone to back out on commitments made, an annexation agreement would make sure that all of those commitments were plainly laid out and mandatory. The commission told Cropper that they aren’t fundamentally opposed to the annexation, but weren’t willing to offer any support until the information was all in line. “It’s like anything else. You get the chance to prove your case,” said Shockley. Cropper will return with the necessary documentation to follow protocol. SOLD! 3 “We are a dedicated team of professionals, ready to assist you in your investment. As leaders in resort new construction sales, we offer the very best in service and experience.” Dan Clayland, Project Manager Richie Difillippo Annie Tingle Michelle Pompa Sharon Daugherty Jeff Beres