![]() accused was a businessman who required to travel throughout Scotland. The accused ran a printing company and the business was dependant upon the sales that he was able to generate. The business was specialised and, accordingly, the accused could not simply employ someone to fulfil his role. Additionally, the hours involved were such that it was not possible to obtain the services of a hired driver. As such, the business would collapse if the accused lost the right to drive, leading to his six full-time employees losing their jobs. In these circumstances, the High Court held that the loss of the accused's licence would have 'catastrophic' effects and a finding of exceptional hardship was made. that are essential if a finding of exceptional hardship is to be made in such circumstances, namely: of fulfilling the accused's business obligations. This could be because the job involves extensive travel or because the nature of the work requires transport (for example, an electrician or builder needs his van to transport his work materials, visit builders merchants etc). employ someone else to fulfil this role. This may be because the work is specialised or because the business could not cope with the extra costs involved. |