![]() itself is usually insufficient to constitute exceptional hardship (see, for example, Forson v Procurator Fiscal Alloa XJ 1520/08) . As mentioned previously, we must have regard to the intention of Parliament when it framed the legislation. While the statute does not expressly limit the concept of hardship to hardship suffered by others, is clear that only in truly exceptional and severe circumstances will hardship to the accused himself suffice (McPake v Lees 1998 SCCR 184). For example, if re-employment would be unlikely with regard to the appellant's age, general health and profession, then the initial job loss may be considered to be |