![]() will take into account the accused's loss of employment. However the court will be more concerned in the effect that a ban would have on other, innocent, parties. The leading case on such hardship is Mugarenza v Procurator Fiscal Glasgow XJ1186/08. This was a successful appeal against the Justice's decision to ban the accused notwithstanding that his business would come to an end and, subsequently, his three employees would lose their jobs. The High Court held that, taking into account the current economic climate, such an effect was more than inconvenience and thus constituted exceptional hardship. |