- Page 1
- Page 2 - Page 3 - Page 4 - Page 5 - Page 6 - Page 7 - Page 8 - Page 9 - Page 10 - Page 11 - Page 12 - Page 13 - Page 14 - Page 15 - Page 16 - Page 17 - Page 18 - Page 19 - Page 20 - Page 21 - Page 22 - Page 23 - Page 24 - Page 25 - Page 26 - Page 27 - Page 28 - Page 29 - Page 30 - Page 31 - Page 32 - Page 33 - Page 34 - Page 35 - Page 36 - Page 37 - Page 38 - Page 39 - Page 40 - Page 41 - Page 42 - Page 43 - Page 44 - Page 45 - Page 46 - Page 47 - Page 48 - Page 49 - Page 50 - Page 51 - Page 52 - Page 53 - Page 54 - Page 55 - Page 56 - Page 57 - Page 58 - Page 59 - Page 60 - Page 61 - Page 62 - Page 63 - Page 64 - Page 65 - Page 66 - Page 67 - Page 68 - Page 69 - Page 70 - Page 71 - Page 72 - Page 73 - Page 74 - Page 75 - Page 76 - Page 77 - Page 78 - Page 79 - Page 80 - Page 81 - Page 82 - Page 83 - Page 84 - Page 85 - Page 86 - Page 87 - Page 88 - Page 89 - Page 90 - Page 91 - Page 92 - Page 93 - Page 94 - Page 95 - Page 96 - Flash version © UniFlip.com |
Page 28
The Dispatch/Maryland Coast Dispatch
June 7, 2013
County, Culver Moving Past Alleged Closed Session Leak
By JOANNE SHRINER
STAFF WRITER
SALISBURY – Controversy among Wicomico County Council members over one official’s alleged breach of confidentiality has apparently subsided as the county and Councilman Bob Culver released statements this week regarding the matter. On this week’s agenda, the Wicomico County Council approved closed session minutes from May 21 when council personnel issues were discussed. However, the council did not vote
to release the closed minutes as they have in the past. A few weeks ago, the council approved the release of closed session minutes from March 18. At that time, it became known the majority of the County Council was questioning Culver and his ability to secure confidential information. Following the unscheduled closed session on May 21, when it became apparent the council was going behind closed doors to further discuss Culver, Wicomico County released a response over allegations. The response stated, “Wicomico County Councilman Bob Culver re-
cently made public statements about the bid process for the new State’s Attorney’s Office. We, the Wicomico County Executive’s Office, the Wicomico County State’s Attorney Matthew Maciarello and the majority of the Wicomico County Council, feel portions of Culver’s statements do not reflect the truth and need to be corrected.” The response goes on to state, any suggestion that the site for the new state’s attorney’s building was selected prior to the Request for Proposal process reaching completion is absolutely false. The county, through its purchasing agent, executed a Request for Proposal process that followed all county rules and regulations. All bids were evaluated and the Executive Branch recommended to the County Council that the most responsive and lowest cost bid be awarded the project, and that the bid process was followed properly was confirmed by the County Council on April 2, by a vote of 5-2, when they determined that there was no flaw in the process. Following a public hearing on the executive’s recommendation, the council unanimously approved the award of the project to G Plus Properties, LLC. Subsequent to being informed by the county attorney of the issue, on March 8, executive and council staff met to discuss the fact that there
had been a release of confidential information from the closed council session on March 5. At this meeting, no decision as to what action would be taken in response to Culver’s breach of confidentiality was reached. The council then decided to have a closed session on March 18 to discuss Culver’s actions and reprimand Culver privately. “The County Executive, the State’s Attorney and the majority of the County Council feel strongly that public confidence in a clear and transparent bidding process is absolutely essential, and reject outright and repudiate Culver’s allegations that there was anything illegal or unethical about the bid process which led to the decision to award the bid for the new offices of the State’s Attorney,” the county’s statement read. “We have many strong personalities within the Executive’s office and the Council, which lead to strong opinions,” Culver submitted following the county’s response. “Although we may not agree with each other on certain issues, we all have the best intentions for Wicomico County. I don't think that either party will be changing their stance in this case. It is over for now and we need to move forward and finish our budget and work on the many other problems that face our county.”
|